On the one hand, it seems that /Volumes/Beat Link Trigger/Beat Link Trigger.app/Contents/runtime was structured to resemble a bundle.
#Mac os jdk needed show location code
_The code signature thinks that it’s part of a bundle, and yet it has no ist entries or sealed resources.
#Mac os jdk needed show location for mac
However, I don't think realistically we can do this, as Mac relies on this "bridging" library to know this jdk/jre provides a JVM for Mac Java Applications.ĭoing a bit of googling, I found some references that seem interesting, this article talks about some of the issues: Jdk-11.0.7+10-jre: bundle format unrecognized, invalid, or unsuitable UNKNOWN:uu andrewleonard$ codesign -dvvv jdk-11.0.7+10-jre Shipping a signed package shows the AdoptOpenJDK has not been tampered with since you published it. I'd don't want take on the responsibility of 'proving' the JDK hasn't been modified by signing it "Sat, 00:12:18 GMT File already signed.", "Sat, 00:12:18 GMT Task: Sign File (libjvm.dylib)", "Sat, 00:12:18 GMT Task: Sign File (libjsig.dylib)", "Sat, 00:12:18 GMT Task: Iterate Directory Contents (DWARF)", "Sat, 00:12:18 GMT Task: Iterate Directory Contents (Resources)", "Sat, 00:12:18 GMT Task: Iterate Directory Contents (Contents)", "Sat, 00:12:18 GMT Task: Iterate Directory Contents ()", If done correctly, the signing process detects they are already signed and leaves the signature alone. I can use it as is, once the signing is fixed up. If you're not going to sign it, you should be shipping just the directory there is no value in shipping as an Application. What you're shipping is a macOS Application.
0 kommentar(er)
